Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates
📽️ Media
|
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Adding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Nominations are time-sensitive and for one-time use only. An automatic clock starts as soon as they are created. Do not create them in advance, save them for later or re-activate them. Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using
An 'Alternative' is created by adding a sub-section to the nomination page: ====Alternative==== VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
| |||||||||||||||||||
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2025 at 10:12:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Uzbekistan
Info Allakuli Covered Bazaar in Khiva, Uzbekistan. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 10:12, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 10:12, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2025 at 06:08:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors#United_States
Info The Frick Fine Arts Building in the University of Pittsburgh is a landmark building that houses a library and a few departments of the university. Created and uploaded by Dllu – nominated by Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 06:08, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Support I usually find symmetries broken up by off-centre viewpoints interesting. Here, however, it is an interesting game against boredom to find the differences in this image. Otherwise, the image is a very accurate piece of work and there is no FP of this location in its category. -- Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 06:08, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Solid photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:49, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 08:32, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2025 at 23:59:19 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
Info created, uploaded, and nominated by Tk833 -- Tk833 (talk) 23:59, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tk833 (talk) 23:59, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful colors. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:50, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 08:29, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Impressive! -- Radomianin (talk) 09:04, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2025 at 22:53:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family_:_Strophariaceae
Info Sulphur Tuft (Hypholoma fasciculare) in the Bruderwald in Bamberg. Stacked from 11 images. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 22:53, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ermell (talk) 22:53, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent composition and high detail. --August (talk) 23:17, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per August – Julian Lupyan (talk) 23:44, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support as per above. The spiderweb's preservation is a testament to the quality of the stack. JayCubby (talk) 23:56, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Very nice capture of that cluster and very well done! --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 06:17, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per others, especially August. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:51, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:59, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 08:16, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Syntaxys. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:01, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2025 at 20:04:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Finland
Info The Wrede passage is a historic passage formed by the Wrede house in the corner between Pohjoisesplanadi and Mikonkatu (Pohjoisesplanadi 35) and the Central house in the corner between Aleksanterinkatu and Mikonkatu (Aleksanterinkatu 46) in central Helsinki, Finland. The building entity represents Renaissance Revival architecture and was designed and partly commissioned by architect Karl August Wrede, and built in 1888 and 1892. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 20:04, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- ArildV (talk) 20:04, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:55, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Very good photo. I didn't realize this style was considered Renaissance Revival. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:53, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:58, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 08:31, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:58, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2025 at 23:16:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Others
Info Following the input provided on the previous nomination, the picture was improved in two ways. Firstly, it was cropped vertically in order to get rid of the overexposed sky in the top right corner. Secondly, a version with warmer and more vivid colours was uploaded. I think this is a much better version than the previous one. All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:16, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:16, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support I'm glad to see another Photopea user in the wild :) FYI, Photopea messes up the metadata (at least on some browsers), I removed the problematic bit of the file's EXIF. JayCubby (talk) 02:42, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you. It's a pity about the metadata, and I oftentimes forget it. I've transferred the metadata from the original unprocessed file. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:07, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 05:04, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2025 at 21:52:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Palaces#Türkiye
Info Created, uploaded, and nominated by User:Julian Lupyan – Julian Lupyan (talk) 21:52, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Info I took this picture with my former camera, and am aware of the moderate lack of detail. I'm hoping the composition and local noise reduction would make up for this. Perspective is corrected, however some of the building's vertical features seem to be naturally misaligned, which I unfortunately cannot account for. The image is one frame, not a composite. Thank you! – Julian Lupyan (talk) 21:52, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 21:52, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --August (talk) 21:13, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2025 at 20:21:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia
Info Facade of Big Theatre (built 1856) in Moscow, Russia. My photo. Юрий Д.К. 20:21, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 20:21, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment This image is very sharp, however I am noticing barrel distortion. – Julian Lupyan (talk) 21:59, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment Too tight and inaccurate crop and CCW tilt. --Alex Florstein (talk) 06:58, 9 December 2025 (UTC)- I will try to fix. Юрий Д.К. 07:08, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment I've made some fixes. I agree that the crop is tight but I've wanted to shot only the Big Theatre with minimum distracting elements. It is my intent Юрий Д.К. 15:49, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Reasonably tight crop, sharp, well-lit, distortion corrected competently. JayCubby (talk) 18:42, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Wobbanight (talk) 20:53, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support The pillars increasingly tilt to the right and left, but that looks natural to me, and I find that this is a satisfying photo of a beautiful building with pleasant details. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:59, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Still not much pleased with slightly asymmetrical crop, but okay at all. --Alex Florstein (talk) 08:06, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2025 at 20:20:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Palaces#Russia
Info Grand Kremlin Palace (built 1849) and Taynitsky Garden in Moscow, Russia. My photo Юрий Д.К. 20:20, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 20:20, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful lighting and good composition. – Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:01, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Wobbanight (talk) 20:53, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per Julian. A hulking, domineering building, shown as peacefully as possible. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:01, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 08:29, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2025 at 18:46:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Photo techniques/Composites and Montages#Composites (Multiple images merged into one)
Info created by A.B. Phelan – uploaded and restored by Jay – nominated by JayCubby -- JayCubby (talk) 18:46, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support. This is an example of both a photomontage (overlay) and forced perspective. -- JayCubby (talk) 18:46, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support beautiful.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:39, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Love that the New York World Building is in the background. --Wobbanight (talk) 20:54, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 21:35, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per Wobbanight, nom. Shows how experimental and radical photography could be 115 years ago. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:03, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2025 at 14:06:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Indonesia
Info created by LukeTriton – uploaded by LukeTriton – nominated by TheBooker66 -- TheBooker66, but call me Ethan (talk) 14:06, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- TheBooker66, but call me Ethan (talk) 14:06, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Weak support The quality is not great probably because it was taken with a mobile phone, but the nice composition compensates for it. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:24, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Agree, a nice motif, but processing is not good, sorry. Shadows are too dark, sharpening halos visible and detail is not really at FP level. Poco a poco (talk) 19:57, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Posterised sky. Really falls short in quality. --C messier (talk) 20:40, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per above. //SHB2000 (talk) 05:06, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I have to agree with the others. Pity. It's a striking, beautiful composition, but this is FPC, not merely beautiful compositions irrespective of technical quality. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:05, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2025 at 09:59:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Greece
Info View of the village of Zinta in central Crete. The village dates from the medieval time and retains a fortress like appearance. Also from this viewpoint the structures visible are mostly old building, giving a similar impression as a viewer of the previous centuries would have, rather rare for most Greek villages which were massively rebuilt in the post war era. Unfortunately, after the 2021 earthquake pretty much every stone-built house in the image has either collapsed or was heavily damaged (the image is from 2017). All by C messier.
Support -- C messier (talk) 09:59, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 15:28, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support I think the picture would benefit from slight dehazing, but the lighting is great and the overall composition works. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:32, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I miss wow here, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 19:55, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support I like how moody this picture is. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:07, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:51, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2025 at 09:15:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Germany
Info Catholic branch church of St. Anna in Priegendorf. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 09:15, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ermell (talk) 09:15, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --C messier (talk) 10:49, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 10:57, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:04, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Lmbuga (talk) 15:24, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:23, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support JackyM59 (talk) 17:53, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:54, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 20:24, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:07, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:28, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:52, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:35, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support The highlights are well-handled. JayCubby (talk) 19:22, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 05:01, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2025 at 06:43:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#France
Info Porte de l'Aude in the historic fortified city of Carcassonne, Aude, France. The concentric yellow circles that can be seen from exactly this POV is a project from 2018 called "Concentric, eccentric", a work by Felice Varini to celebrate the 20th anniversary of the inscription on the World Heritage List of UNESCO. Founded during the Gallo-Roman period, the citadel derives its reputation from its 3 kilometres (1.9 mi) long double surrounding walls interspersed by 52 towers. The medieval citadel, situated on a hill on the right bank of the river Aude, was restored at the end of the 19th century by the theorist and architect Eugène Viollet-le-Duc. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 06:43, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 06:43, 8 December 2025 (UTC)- In my opinion, this is an act of vandalism that destroys a historical monument. Similar circles could be created using lighting (spotlights) without damaging the historical appearance of the monument. However, i
Support this image as being of excellent quality and high educational. -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:09, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- I agree with you. I find this kind of expressiones too bold. The strips are composed of temporary thin aluminum and therefore should vanish soon, but it's probably gonna hold longer than they expected. Poco a poco (talk) 20:03, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support An interesting art form on a more or less historic building.--Ermell (talk) 09:11, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Well documeneted, also nice light.--C messier (talk) 10:07, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Magnificent view JackyM59 (talk) 12:02, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:02, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 15:29, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment There's probably a bird next to the spire atop the pyramidal roof in the background (see the note). --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:55, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- Kiril Simeonovski: Yes, definitely a bird. Not sure what your expectation is, do I need to remove the bird so that you can support this image as FP? To be honest, I don't really think that a birdfree sky (especially if they are so small) is required for the FP star. Poco a poco (talk) 19:33, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- I wasn’t entirely sure what it is even though it didn’t look like a dust spot. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 20:08, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support I really like the angle and the ambient with the great winter morning light. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 20:08, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Great composition, nice detail. But the lighting does destroy any wow for me. --August (talk) 20:51, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:07, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:27, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:35, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 05:01, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per George. Absolutely vandalism, but a fine photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:07, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2025 at 06:14:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Tricholomataceae
Info Fallen over (Lepista flaccida) decaying on a compost heap. Focus stack of 113 photos.
All by me -- Famberhorst (talk) 06:14, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 06:14, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Exceptional detail, good composition --Tagooty (talk) 14:30, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Tagooty above.
Question: Do you forage, or just photograph? JayCubby (talk) 16:08, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
*:Answer: I love nature (and I'm very concerned about it). I enjoy photographing the usefulness of transience, like this photo, which is ultimately what nature is all about. But don't eat mushrooms..--Famberhorst (talk) 16:52, 8 December 2025 (UTC)- Thank you! I have the same sentiment about mushrooming (it's too easy to find a toxic lookalike). JayCubby (talk) 17:01, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:20, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:53, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:08, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:27, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:53, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Some of the bokeh looks strange to me close up, but who can argue with those great details? The mushroom is well placed in the picture frame, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:09, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2025 at 06:14:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Germany
Info The Württemberg Mausoleum in the Rotenberg part of Untertürkheim, Stuttgart, Germany. Created/uploaded by Julian Herzog – nominated by Syntaxys -- Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 06:14, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support As far as I could determine, there is no FP of this motif in its category. In my opinion, this image is very well done in terms of technique and composition. -- Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 06:14, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment From the four images of the monument by the uploader (Julian Herzog), IMHO this is the one with the least wow factor. --C messier (talk) 10:27, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, compared to the other shots, the image lacks a certain wow factor, but it is better in terms of technique and composition. In the shots taken in the evening light, the subject is a little too small or there are distracting elements in the image (which could be cropped out). Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 10:42, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- The frontal symmetric shot has a much better composition. Wouldn't mind about the edges being slightly blurry given the wow factor it has. C messier (talk) 10:46, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- It's quite simple: if you think it's a good picture, then support it. If you think I'm wrong, vote against it. I look very closely at the images I nominate. It doesn't matter whether they are my own images or those of other photographers. The images should at least be well done in terms of technique and composition, and stand out from all the other images in the respective category on that basis alone. Otherwise, I let my intuition guide me. A lot of images are awarded here without the wow factor; it's not the only criterion for me. Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 05:54, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- I tend to agree with User:C messier, though. This is certainly a technically good image and the composition is fine, but all of the other QIs in this series (01-06, of which this one is 02) are more striking. C messier, would you like to nominate one of the other images? I might do so, perhaps, if you don't. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:16, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- That's a good idea, or you could set it up as an alternative to this image. But please decide for yourself, I've already made my decision ;-) Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 09:44, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- I tend to agree with User:C messier, though. This is certainly a technically good image and the composition is fine, but all of the other QIs in this series (01-06, of which this one is 02) are more striking. C messier, would you like to nominate one of the other images? I might do so, perhaps, if you don't. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:16, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- It's quite simple: if you think it's a good picture, then support it. If you think I'm wrong, vote against it. I look very closely at the images I nominate. It doesn't matter whether they are my own images or those of other photographers. The images should at least be well done in terms of technique and composition, and stand out from all the other images in the respective category on that basis alone. Otherwise, I let my intuition guide me. A lot of images are awarded here without the wow factor; it's not the only criterion for me. Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 05:54, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- The frontal symmetric shot has a much better composition. Wouldn't mind about the edges being slightly blurry given the wow factor it has. C messier (talk) 10:46, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, compared to the other shots, the image lacks a certain wow factor, but it is better in terms of technique and composition. In the shots taken in the evening light, the subject is a little too small or there are distracting elements in the image (which could be cropped out). Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 10:42, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 20:25, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:58, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:25, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2025 at 21:08:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#North Macedonia
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:08, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:08, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support I like the picture because it shows how deeply rooted religiosity is in everyday life. A church or chapel can take many different forms.
I'm sorry, I prepared a new nomination without checking the current list first. It just so happens to be on the same theme right after your nomination. --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 06:29, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment The light is exceptional, elevating this rather mundane motif. The frame is however rather tight. --C messier (talk) 10:10, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Stunning contrast JackyM59 (talk) 12:00, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent light. Acroterion (talk) 13:23, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:58, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 20:25, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --B. Jankuloski (talk) 20:44, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:08, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:26, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 11:07, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:53, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per anderen.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:33, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:59, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2025 at 21:01:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Germany
Info Several hundred coke ovens in Essen – created and uploaded by GZagatta – nominated by AugustgeylerSHB2000 -- August (talk) 21:01, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- August (talk) 21:01, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Wov! --Lmbuga (talk) 21:15, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support One of my favorite images from this year's wlm contest. --Wobbanight (talk) 21:29, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 22:26, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support That's great! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:15, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Yes, that's a great picture. Maybe I would have cropped it a little more at the top, but it's very well done with the reflection and lines. --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 06:34, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:52, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --C messier (talk) 10:11, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 10:56, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support !! -- Radomianin (talk) 12:15, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support The angularity is striking. Acroterion (talk) 13:24, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:56, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:18, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
{{FPD|A great candidate, but please, 2 noms at a time. Thank you. [[User:Poco a poco|Poco a poco]] ([[User talk:Poco a poco|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 21:55, 8 December 2025 (UTC)}}
- @Poco a poco and Augustgeyler: I'm willing to take over this nomination under my name if needed (replace the nominator name at your will). Not that I condone creating more than 2 nominations at once, but mistakes happen and it's a good photo. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:12, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- Yes please. August (talk) 09:19, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you. That's a pragmatic solution. Poco a poco (talk) 12:57, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- I've fixed the takeover and neutralized the FPD so the FPC Bot doesn't get any ideas and close this prematurely now. --Cart (talk) 13:13, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you. That's a pragmatic solution. Poco a poco (talk) 12:57, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- Yes please. August (talk) 09:19, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Poco a poco and Augustgeyler: I'm willing to take over this nomination under my name if needed (replace the nominator name at your will). Not that I condone creating more than 2 nominations at once, but mistakes happen and it's a good photo. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:12, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:38, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:09, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:26, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support. And i can also put +1 from my nomination limit for this candidate too. -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:56, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:32, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2025 at 18:46:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Serranidae (Serranids)
Info Longfin grouper (Epinephelus quoyanus), Anilao, Philippines. The longfin grouper is found on silty reefs in coastal waters at depths of less than 50 metres (160 ft) in the Indo-West Pacific, especially in the Indomalayan region. This species, that attains a maximum total length of 40 centimetres (16 in), is a sedentary species which feeds on worms, smaller fishes and crustaceans. Note: there are no FPs of this species on Commons. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 18:46, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 18:46, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:12, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Wobbanight (talk) 20:53, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support, but what I see at the end of the fish's tail looks like CAs to me.--Lmbuga (talk) 20:54, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
- There is in fact some
chromatic aberration. --Wobbanight (talk) 01:26, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- I see it, too.
Support with the confidence that it'll be fixed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:16, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Gone, thank you Poco a poco (talk) 07:07, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- I see it, too.
- There is in fact some
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 22:28, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:55, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Thanks for the fixes. JayCubby (talk) 16:50, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:17, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 20:27, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:11, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:25, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:30, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2025 at 16:07:12 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Nectariniidae (Sunbirds and Spiderhunters)
Info created by and uploaded by Charlesjsharp – nominated by Wobbanight -- Wobbanight (talk) 16:07, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Wobbanight (talk) 16:07, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Thank you for the nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:40, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:11, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful, sharp bird. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:17, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent work. Including the crop ;-) --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 06:36, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:53, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:16, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:50, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 20:27, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:13, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:25, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:29, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2025 at 11:41:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Uzbekistan
Info Wood carving Andijan Jame Mosque Complex (Мечеть Джами в Андижане, Andijon jome masjidi majmuasi). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 11:41, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Info 1st Place on 2025 WLM Uzbekistan.
Support -- Mile (talk) 11:41, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:05, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Wobbanight (talk) 13:20, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Earth605 (talk) 16:06, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Question Congrats for the award, but is the lack of symmetry for real or due to an off-centered POV? within the square the center is too far to the left. Poco a poco (talk) 16:33, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
- Probably off-center, some answer was in the begining, and thank you. God'unov for me. Mile (talk) 18:45, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support –Julian Lupyan (talk) 20:22, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 22:31, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful and sharp. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:19, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --C messier (talk) 10:12, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Acroterion (talk) 13:25, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:51, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 20:27, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:13, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:24, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:28, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2025 at 09:53:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Russia
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 09:53, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Красный wanna talk? 09:53, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 11:10, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Info Рекомендую, еслу солнце, диафрагму на ф/3.2 или ф/4. А обязательно EV (експозиция) на -0.3 или -0.7. Я сейчас пользую только RAW формат. Проблема с ДЙИ, отсутствует защитная бленда про бокововой свет. Потом надо коректироват хроматическу аберрацию + повысить резкость + повысить EV. --Mile (talk) 12:32, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
- Спасибо, на будущее учту. Хотя, с дронами проблема в том, что пока настройки меняешь, он разряжается, а ещё тогда уже можно было получить проблемы с полицией за полёт над телебашней...
Красный wanna talk? 14:08, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
- Спасибо, на будущее учту. Хотя, с дронами проблема в том, что пока настройки меняешь, он разряжается, а ещё тогда уже можно было получить проблемы с полицией за полёт над телебашней...
Oppose Only the view of the tower is interesting but it is too small in the overall compo Poco a poco (talk) 16:30, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Neutral I've calculated the JPEG QF at 85--substantial artifacts! Red, can you export at a higher quality? JayCubby (talk) 20:32, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
- No, I don't store RAW files after 2-3 weeks after the uploading here. It would be too much disc space. Красный wanna talk? 20:38, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
- Please don't get rid of your Raw files, it's the equivalent of throwing away film negatives: you lose the only real proof of authorship, and will no longer be able to benefit from future demosaicing algorithms. External hard drives (plural, so you have at least a backup) are cheap compared to the cost of photographic gear. Julesvernex2 (talk) 15:45, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- No, I don't store RAW files after 2-3 weeks after the uploading here. It would be too much disc space. Красный wanna talk? 20:38, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2025 at 09:51:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Painted ceilings
Info created and uploaded by 26D – nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 09:51, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Красный wanna talk? 09:51, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 11:09, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Despite missing EXIF info. --Mile (talk) 11:45, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:06, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Earth605 (talk) 16:07, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:27, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Wow! -- Radomianin (talk) 18:27, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:15, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 20:23, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 22:03, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:21, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Acroterion (talk) 13:26, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:49, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 20:28, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:14, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:24, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 11:04, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:28, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2025 at 05:25:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family : Amaryllidaceae
Info Hippeastrum houseplant. The delicate beauty of the flower buds. Focus stack of 14 photos}}
All by me -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:25, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:25, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 11:05, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:40, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:06, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Striking graphic clarity - the flower's form is distilled into such clean lines and nuanced tones that it evokes the precision of a classic botanical illustration. A refined and impeccably controlled study of shape and texture. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:37, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 20:10, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:15, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Superb stack, lovely lighting. JayCubby (talk) 20:34, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per others. Do please get rid of the 2 little red hot pixels toward the lower right, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:23, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Done, False pixels removed. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:07, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Agnes Monkelbaan, there are still a few. I've highlighted them for easy removal here using my preferred pixel-peeping tool. JayCubby (talk) 19:22, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Done Thank you very much for your comments. I found two and deleted them.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:02, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Very nice work, I like the complementary nuances. --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 06:41, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:31, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Striking composition.
Comment Is the background digitally blacked out? If so, this should be mentioned in the image description. --Tagooty (talk) 14:33, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- Answer: The photo of this houseplant was taken in our home against a dark background.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:31, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:15, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 20:28, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Stunning image. I would highly recommend denoising the background with a mask, but support regardless of the outcome. – Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:06, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Done. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:12, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:14, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:23, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 11:03, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2025 at 03:23:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Morocco
Info The old city of Taza is on a hillock. The new city on the plains below retains the traditional architecture of this semi-desert region: rectangular blocks, painted white and colours that blend with the scenery, and a prominent mosque. Note: No FPs of cities in Morocco. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 03:23, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 03:23, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 11:08, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Very, very good. Excellent. I voted in favour thinking that you will correct the dust spots that I am going to point out to you. So far, I have seen four. One is right at the top of the sky above the street lamp that is next to the right-hand side of a restaurant called O'Belvedere. This restaurant is located at the right-hand edge of the image, almost at the bottom. I will try to locate the others for you.--Lmbuga (talk) 20:22, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
- I cannot describe the others in words. If you wish, I can make notes on the image (approximate because it is a huge photograph).--Lmbuga (talk) 20:35, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Done @Lmbuga: Thanks for the review. Morocco is a dry, dusty region; while changing lenses in a mirrorless camera it is difficult to keep dust out. I've removed all the dust spots I could find and uploaded a new version. In case you see any more, please place a note on the image. --Tagooty (talk) 03:43, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- I see quite a few others in clouds. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:25, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Done @Ikan Kekek: Thanks -- I've fixed several. Please see the latest version. --Tagooty (talk) 04:48, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- I regret to say that there are a large number left, too many for me to try to mark. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:40, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: I found that the opacity setting in LR had inadvertently got reduced; this resulted in only partial removal of spots. I have increased opacity to 100% in all the spots and fine-tuned the removal where needed. Please see the new (final I hope) version. My apologies for the mistake the the extra effort it has caused you. --Tagooty (talk) 09:51, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks. I don't see any obvious dust spots remaining. I find it hard to judge this photo, though. It's formidable work, to be sure, but I have to live with the sprawling composition for a while longer before passing judgment, because at close range, most of the buildings look pretty similar, though not the mosque, the surrounding countryside or the sky. I'd say it probably deserves the star, which is good because the votes so far show that it will get one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:23, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- I see quite a few others in clouds. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:25, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 22:33, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --C messier (talk) 10:15, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:48, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 20:30, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:15, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:58, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:27, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:58, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2025 at 01:48:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Germany
Info The Anzeiger-Hochhaus in Hanover – created and uploaded by T meltzer – nominated by Augustgeyler -- August (talk) 01:48, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- August (talk) 01:48, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:40, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Symmetries always appeal to me. This one is beautifully executed. -- XRay 💬 11:05, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Side crop could be better. --Mile (talk) 11:49, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:07, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment Is there some
chromatic aberration on the dome? --Wobbanight (talk) 13:51, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support The thigh crop works here --Poco a poco (talk) 16:29, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:17, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 22:34, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Really nice chape and well-presented. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:27, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support This is a place where tight cropping works well. Acroterion (talk) 13:27, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:43, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 20:30, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:15, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:23, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:26, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:58, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2025 at 23:34:18 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Amphibians#Family : Leptodactylidae (Southern Frogs)
Info created by Alexander Abair – uploaded by Alexander Abair – nominated by User:Lmbuga -- Lmbuga (talk) 23:34, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Lmbuga (talk) 23:34, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Wobbanight (talk) 13:19, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment AA, there's no EXIF, can that be added? JayCubby (talk) 20:35, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
- I have asked the photographer--Lmbuga (talk) 21:28, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
- I have the EXIF data, but I don't know how to add it to the file page. Alexander Abair (talk) 22:20, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Alexander Abair, see Template:Photo Information/doc. You could also overwrite the Commons file with the original. Cheers! JayCubby (talk) 23:00, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
- Awesome! Thank you. I've added EXIF data. Please let me know if any corrections need to be made. Alexander Abair (talk) 23:20, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Alexander Abair, see Template:Photo Information/doc. You could also overwrite the Commons file with the original. Cheers! JayCubby (talk) 23:00, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Alexander Abair (talk) 22:22, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Thanks for the metadata. JayCubby (talk) 00:12, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Cool, and a bit of a strange juxtaposition with a human finger. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:28, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Great picture, I almost nominated it myself! --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 06:45, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:55, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Wow! And good quaity too! --C messier (talk) 10:17, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support An unusual subject and POV. Acroterion (talk) 13:28, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:41, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:13, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per Ikan. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:16, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:22, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2025 at 20:51:01 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Germany
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 20:51, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 20:51, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment Kind of grainy. Probably opposing for FP but willing to hear an argument. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:52, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Good imho despite some noise Юрий Д.К. 20:32, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per Yuriy. --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:56, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I think the noise/grain is below the current standard of FP building ceilings. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:25, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2025 at 19:56:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Tunisia
Info created by Skander zarrad – uploaded by Skander zarrad – nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 19:56, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 19:56, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment Good photo, may support, but it looks like there's a dust spot in a cloud top right. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:55, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment It might not be that easy for some people to see, but clearly, no attempt has been made to get rid of it. Skander zarrad, please make the improvements suggested in this thread. Your photo is very good and worth a feature, but you need to be responsive to this thread. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:28, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Support But you should fix the dust spot. --C messier (talk) 10:19, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose I do agree that there is FP potential here but I would only support with a more interesting lighting (golden hour?) Poco a poco (talk) 19:49, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 22:01, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose lighting subpar for an FP. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:16, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:21, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I do think the lighting is fine, but the quality is subpar, and there is some light
chromatic aberration on the far-left pillar. --Wobbanight (talk) 20:57, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:56, 10 December 2025 (UTC)}
Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2025 at 18:41:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1930-1939
Info created by Fairfax Corporation – restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 18:41, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 18:41, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Question This is not merely restored. Why did you choose to crop out a lot of the original photo and give this version a portrait orientation instead of the original landscape orientation? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:58, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
- Because you don't write on parts of the image that you intend to be part of the photo as cropped, so there's clear indications of the photographer's intent to crop. Adam Cuerden (talk) 04:52, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: To give a bit more: This is a genre of photographs from the era when travelling by boat was common. Since passengers generally had to wait some time to disembark, newspapers would send photographers onto the ship to photograph anyone famous that was on it. This got you a chatty society article about all the people who were on the ship, and, if they did anything, you had a photograph for the paper. I believe that portable historical cameras generally were rather biased towards shooting in landscape. Adam Cuerden (talk) 04:58, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
- OK, I appreciate the explanation, but you included some parts of the photo that had writing on them, cloning out the writing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:05, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
- So, to be clear, I'd like more insight into your specific choices of where to crop. Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:48, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: My general rule is use the guides to see intent, but go a little more generous because this firstly maximises reuse potential, and secondly, it helps avoid historic usage from interfering with modern usage (If you look at an image marked for cropping, the crops can be exceedingly tight for newspaper use where the limited size of reproduction and low resolution of halftoning can make a huge difference. Reusers can make secondary crops, but these can only remove material, not add.
- I did consider adding more of the shoulder - the only cropped part in focus - but it made the image really unbalanced: There are certain rules for how portraits get cropped, and including all of the far shoulder at a one-quarter turn.... is not in line with them. To understand why, consider File:Learie Constantine 1930 03 - uncropped.png - the left (for the viewer) shoulder is three to four times the width of the right, vastly unbalancing the image. Adam Cuerden (talk) 04:22, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Thanks. I find myself agreeing with you on these matters of composition. I still think the file description should state more directly that part of the original has been cropped out and is not merely at different dimensions from the original, but it's ultimately probably clear enough. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:32, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: I've clarified it a bit: put the original dimensions in the more standard width-by-height order, added a thumbnail of the uncropped original, and calculated the approximate dimensions of the crop on the image. Think that should clarify it. Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:00, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- So, to be clear, I'd like more insight into your specific choices of where to crop. Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:48, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- OK, I appreciate the explanation, but you included some parts of the photo that had writing on them, cloning out the writing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:05, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 11:30, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ezarateesteban 17:23, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 22:01, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2025 at 18:31:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera/Papilionidae#Genus : Iphiclides
Info One FP of the underside of this species which I have nominated for delisting. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:31, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:31, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:13, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Good Sharp (in two ways) photo. Detail down to the scale can be seen. CJS, I tagged an area on the wing, is it a hot pixel or a reflection? JayCubby (talk) 20:50, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Done Some artefact, thanks. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:38, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
- Much appreciated. JayCubby (talk) 22:11, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:53, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 21:08, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support I was hoping more of the butterfly would be sharp at full size, but still good enough for FP and a nice composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:02, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:49, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment Merely a fight between background vs DOF. But you had bonus to f/8-9. Interesting that camera put so much tolerance, i thought its Manual Exposure. --Mile (talk) 11:59, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
- I seldom use fully manual exposure. Not enough time! Here I would have selected 1/1250 shutter speed and auto ISO. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:44, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:07, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Per Ikan.--Ermell (talk) 20:22, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:14, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:33, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 20:33, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:17, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:21, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:54, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
File:Segelfalter04.JPG (delist)
Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2025 at 18:30:15
Info This was promoted with 6 positive votes and three negative. It would struggle at QI I beleive. (Original nomination)
Delist -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:30, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Delist also for procedural considerations. One of the ‘support’ voters, Idiot, was a one-day account (20 June 2008) which has been blocked only a few days later. Idiot’s contributions suggest to me that this user was just an alias of some long-time FPC regular – no real newbie makes 6 edits to their user page and then heads over to FPC voting. Idiot’s vote should have been deleted after the block and the votes on this nomination should have been re-counted. Of course the FPC rules of June 2008 were a bit different, they required only “[a]t least 5 supporting votes”, but they also required a “[r]atio of supporting/opposing votes at least 2/1 (a two-thirds majority)”, just as today. If we consider Idiot’s vote as invalid, we get 5 pro, 3 contra votes, so that the nomination does not reach the two-thirds majority. IMHO this candidate should be delisted also for that reason. – Aristeas (talk) 19:07, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Delist --Wobbanight (talk) 20:42, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Keep 2008, sorry, in 2100, we're shit. Why do we need to declare that the above are not important?--Lmbuga (talk) 20:57, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
- Lmbuga, for the sake of the FPCBot, on delist nominations we don't use {{s}}. Please change your vote and use {{keep}} instead. For details, look at the rules at the top of the page. Thank you, --Cart (talk) 13:08, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
- Changed. Thank you. --Lmbuga (talk) 16:37, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Question Are we judging this by current-day standards? It's an interesting composition, though definitely not tack sharp. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:03, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Delist This should not have been promoted anyway. Yann (talk) 11:33, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
- True, and after all a good reason to
Delist . -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:42, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- +2.
Delist . --SHB2000 (talk) 05:18, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
- +2.
- True, and after all a good reason to
Delist per Aristeas's argument. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:57, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Keep Compared to other images in this category, this is a well-executed photograph. It is atmospheric and beautifully composed, even if the resolution is somewhat low by modern standards. --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 06:52, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Keep FP for me Юрий Д.К. 20:33, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Keep per Lmbuga. --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:53, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2025 at 18:00:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Vegetables_(raw)
Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:00, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:00, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support ----Lmbuga (talk) 20:03, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:53, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Great level of detail. JayCubby (talk) 22:58, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support There are 3 existing FPs of romanesco broccoli. One is a great closeup, but the other two are more comparable to this one: File:Romanesco broccoli (Brassica oleracea).jpg and File:Fractal Broccoli.jpg. File:Romanesco broccoli (Brassica oleracea).jpg seems sharper and better to me, overall, but it's not a slam dunk, and this one does have great details and is of a different color, so I'll support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:10, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
- Would File:Fractal_Broccoli.jpg be a candidate for delisting? It seem's the author isn't a Commons user. Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 07:04, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- Already delisted in 2021. And the FP does not require a Commons/Wikipedian Author. -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:22, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- Ah yes, I didn't look carefully enough. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:26, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- Already delisted in 2021. And the FP does not require a Commons/Wikipedian Author. -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:22, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- Would File:Fractal_Broccoli.jpg be a candidate for delisting? It seem's the author isn't a Commons user. Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 07:04, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:15, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:47, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 11:03, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Mile (talk) 11:54, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:07, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 19:45, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:25, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 20:35, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:18, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:20, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:54, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2025 at 17:12:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Nuts
Info created by Lmbuga – uploaded by Lmbuga – nominated by Lmbuga -- Lmbuga (talk) 17:12, 6 December 2025 (UTC).
Comment So many silent voices creating silent art to defend their lives. Sale of chestnuts from the Sofragal cooperative in Rúa Nova street. --Lmbuga (talk) 17:27, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Lmbuga (talk) 17:12, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:05, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Very nice arrangement, beneficial soft light, well photographed. – Aristeas (talk) 19:35, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Each fiber is visible. Nicely lit as per Aristeas. chestnut blight is an interesting read. JayCubby (talk) 20:44, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Wobbanight (talk) 20:44, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:53, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 21:09, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Great still life, good composition. --XRay 💬 22:31, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:11, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Strong support Beautiful image – Julian Lupyan (talk) 06:59, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:14, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:45, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:08, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:20, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:40, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --C messier (talk) 10:24, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 19:42, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 20:26, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:18, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:19, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:53, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2025 at 11:19:01 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Saarland
Info created, uploaded and nominated by FlocciNivis -- FlocciNivis (talk) 11:19, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- FlocciNivis (talk) 11:19, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:05, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Unlike most photos at FPC, this is a composition I can imagine trying to achieve (at lesser quality, of course) on my cellphone, but a lot of people wouldn't even notice it as a motif, though it's pretty. Thanks for noticing it! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:14, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Per Ikan Kekek. --Famberhorst (talk) 07:04, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful composition and lovely colours. JackyM59 (talk) 07:25, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:43, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:08, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Neutral Fine to me but the composition is too static (centered), I think the POV was not the best, the road is not a plus either. The subject is though nice. Poco a poco (talk) 16:22, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Юрий Д.К. 20:35, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:19, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:52, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2025 at 09:09:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Animals
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:09, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:09, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice and nice composition. --Lmbuga (talk) 12:33, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Request Very nice photo, i will support. However, i can see some color residue. Can you convert it to pure black and white? -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:16, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
- Sure, I will do it tonight or tomorrow morning -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:51, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Done -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:11, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support. Thanks! -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:25, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
- Sure, I will do it tonight or tomorrow morning -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:51, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
- I prefer the version that wasn't in black and white.. I'm even considering withdrawing my vote.--Lmbuga (talk) 03:38, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- The original version (first file in history) was pure black and white as stated in the file description. With the second version in the file history I accidently introduced some colors in the image, which I fixed in the latest version. In any case you can't see the difference in colors in the thumbnail version of each file. The black and white presentation of this image serves a purpose: to better showcase the zebra stripes as I explain their role in the file description -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:53, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- I prefer the version that wasn't in black and white.. I'm even considering withdrawing my vote.--Lmbuga (talk) 03:38, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:17, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:53, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Look at the detail reflected in the zebra's eye! JayCubby (talk) 22:35, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support That's really artistic! It would be natural to see this photo exhibited in a photography show in an art gallery. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:16, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Great image and composition. Please do a greyscale convertion! --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 03:21, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:03, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per Ikan Kekek – Julian Lupyan (talk) 07:06, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:40, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support The photo is reduced to a minimum and yet very expressive. However, it would be good if the categorization were better. -- XRay 💬 11:03, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Done categories added -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:38, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:08, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Something different Poco a poco (talk) 16:22, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Ikan. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:55, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Zebras are such photogenic creatures, it's amazing. Wolverine X-eye 13:14, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 19:39, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:28, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support amazing. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:19, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:52, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2025 at 04:06:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Exteriors#Landscapes
Info created by Edward Lear – uploaded and nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 04:06, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 04:06, 6 December 2025 (UTC)- Interesting painting and a good but fairly small reproduction, considering the dimensions of the painting: 47 1/8 x 72 inches (119.7 x 182.9 cm). In view of that, this is a valuable VI/QI, but
Weak oppose for FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:20, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per Ikan. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:19, 9 December 2025 (UTC)- You're right,
I withdraw my nomination UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:46, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2025 at 03:33:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#China
Info all by 瑞丽江的河水.
Ganden Sumtseling Monastery is a Tibetan Buddhist monastery established in 1679, which is located in Shangri-La, Yunnan, China. -- 瑞丽江的河水 (talk) 03:33, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Abstain As author.-- 瑞丽江的河水 (talk) 03:33, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Strong support The composition and lighting are beautiful. --Wobbanight (talk) 14:16, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment The photo is interesting, but I doubt it could be FP, especially with those plant spikes sticking out at the bottom. At least the ones on the left half of the photo could have been removed. --Lmbuga (talk) 16:17, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:43, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Despite what has been said, I find it impressive. --Lmbuga (talk) 16:54, 6 December 2025 (UTC)- I'd prefer more generous crops left and right, but still,
Support for the photo, the buildings and the labeling. The bits of tree or shrub tops at the bottom of the picture plain are OK with me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:24, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support—FradonStar (talk) 01:51, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:21, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Weak support per IK. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:20, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:18, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:52, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2025 at 00:49:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#France
Info I love the use of light and shadows in this French street scene. created by Tournasol7 – uploaded by Tournasol7 – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 00:49, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 00:49, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Wobbanight (talk) 00:57, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:21, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:32, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 12:36, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Many shades of yellow JackyM59 (talk) 13:31, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support. Nice presentation of oldtown -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:39, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support It’s often quite difficult to take a representative photo of these charming lanes; this is an excellent example. – Aristeas (talk) 19:33, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per others. Also a nice composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:25, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:49, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:37, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Very beautiful composition. The photo combines two contradictory things: restlessness (due to the many elements) and calm (due to the similar elements). -- XRay 💬 11:01, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:09, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 20:30, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 20:38, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:20, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:17, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --C messier (talk) 10:09, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2025 at 00:49:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
Info Extremely high quality astrophotography from an amateur astronomer with an account on Commons. created by Cpayoub – uploaded by Cpayoub – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 00:49, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 00:49, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:32, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:28, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Very dramatic. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:15, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:19, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:53, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --C messier (talk) 13:07, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:00, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 20:38, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Strong support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:20, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:17, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 10:59, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2025 at 21:13:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Doors
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 21:13, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 21:13, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Intricate and interesting. JayCubby (talk) 21:52, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:07, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Question Sorry, why wov? --Lmbuga (talk) 02:52, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
- Isn't that ultimately a matter of personal taste? --XRay 💬 08:53, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Ok. I was just wondering if there was anything special about the artistic design of the door. --Lmbuga (talk) 11:56, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Weak support
- I've always liked geometric shapes. Here, minimalism and geometry come together in an appealing color scheme. I find that quite special. --XRay 💬 12:44, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Thank you, your opinion encourages me to value it. The Portuguese text ‘Mundial sapatarias’ is very charming, surprising and expressive. Provides context. Now I like it much more. And ‘wov’ for so many silent voices making art to defend their lives.--Lmbuga (talk) 16:24, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
- What does wov stand for in this context? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:30, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:31, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:53, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:34, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:15, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:19, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 20:31, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 20:38, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:21, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:16, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2025 at 16:01:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports
Info A hiker on the last meters before reaching the summit of the Schneespitze in the Stubai Alps. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 16:01, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 16:01, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:47, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Support I think the picture is very well done, especially the composition. Perhaps the view into the background could be improved a little, but I know such situations too, it's difficult. --Syntaxys (talk) 06:39, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:49, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 08:54, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:31, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support ----Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:44, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Impressive. --Lmbuga (talk) 17:59, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment It's an impressive composition. Only the cross is fully in focus, but maybe that's deliberate and symbolic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:32, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Very nice. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:17, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:18, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 19:33, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 20:32, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:21, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:50, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2025 at 09:02:51 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#France
Info created by User:JackyM59 – uploaded by User:JackyM59 – nominated by JackyM59 -- JackyM59 (talk) 09:02, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 09:02, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Wobbanight (talk) 14:17, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment Very nice, but on the right, only a few pixels are missing to include the entire building in the image, as shown here. I think the composition would be better then, even if it's just about the lighthouse.--Milseburg (talk) 16:09, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
- I agree that that composition is better. Also, the sky is a bit noisy in this photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:10, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Info I cropped the photo to remove a tourist's hair. Here is a new version cropped to 16:9 with the entire abbey. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JackyM59 (talk • contribs) 18:02, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Full agreement now. --Milseburg (talk) 11:36, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Much better. I saw directly this new version, and I was not understanding the comments, indeed. Statisfactory composition, imho. --Harlock81 (talk) 22:05, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Support For me, the compo is well done. --Syntaxys (talk) 06:44, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:31, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose It's not just noise that you see in the sky and the rest of the photo. Oversharpened IMO. The image lacks natural detail. --Lmbuga (talk) 18:05, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:54, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose As per Lmbuga, noise is a little high for me. I don't think a good composition of something stationary like this without great technical achievement is an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:34, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:50, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose excessive noise for an FP. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:22, 9 December 2025 (UTC)- At full size the noise is low and the image gets my
Weak support Юрий Д.К. 15:53, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Too noisy. --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:49, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2025 at 06:09:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Sapindaceae
Info created by Sumit Surai – uploaded by Sumit Surai – nominated by Sumitsurai -- Sumit Surai (talk) 06:09, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Sumit Surai (talk) 06:09, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I thought others might like this photo a lot. Nice fall colors, to be sure, but no great composition to me, though it has some makings of one and thus I understand why you nominated it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:37, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice compo IMO. --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:48, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per Ikan. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:22, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful Юрий Д.К. 15:54, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2025 at 20:18:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Palaces#United_Kingdom
Info Surprised how few FPs we have of Buckingham Palace. The only one which shows the full exterior is this one. So figured I'd give this one a try, taken during the Captain's inspection (hence the band playing and the crowd watching). In trying to retain detail on the building, I overexposed the sky a bit, but I decided to embrace the intensity of it on an otherwise gray day. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 20:18, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 20:18, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:55, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Strong support Per the same reason I promoted this image to QI status. --Wobbanight 02:13, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Too many people. Yann (talk) 16:18, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The blow highlights are excessive, in my view. In this case HDR imaging seems essential for the management of the light -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:42, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Too much overexposure, too many people Poco a poco (talk) 11:21, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose QI, but not extraordinary. --Thi (talk) 11:28, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per Poco and thi. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:23, 9 December 2025 (UTC)Invalid vote. Sorry, but acc. to the rules you need “at least 10 days and 50 edits” on Commons in order to vote here, and AFAICS you had only a few edits before this vote. – Aristeas (talk) 19:25, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per Poco a poco — Erika Dauði (talk) 11:36, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination — Rhododendrites talk | 13:46, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2025 at 20:13:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Chroicocephalus
Info Black-headed gull (Chroicocephalus ridibundus) vocalizing in London. Debated nominating this one, which has maybe a little more detail, but I prefer to see it calling. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 20:13, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 20:13, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment The other one has a cleaner background, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:57, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Wobbanight (talk) 20:48, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose I really like this gull, but the blurred bird in the background is too distracting to me. Were it further to the right and more separated from this gull, I'd be fine with it. I'd support the other gull picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:39, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment Agree, background is killing the subject. Especially that blue. Compo could be better. --Mile (talk) 12:04, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2025 at 18:27:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#North_Rhine-Westphalia
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 18:27, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 18:27, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Support I didn't even know Bielefeld existed ;-) But seriously, it's a very beautiful portrait of the old town. The tree stands proudly in spring despite the bad weather, and the composition is very well done. --Syntaxys (talk) 19:55, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Wobbanight (talk) 14:18, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:42, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:30, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry but neither subject/compo, nor lighting nor Detail are extraordinary in my eyes, Poco a poco (talk) 11:18, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:48, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support JackyM59 (talk) 21:02, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:23, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:14, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Nothing special here. Also, the sky is not the best. --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:47, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
File:Crested Tit 2025 11 30 02.jpg, featured
Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2025 at 13:19:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Paridae_(Tits)
Info A crested tit (Lophophanes cristatus) – c/u/n by Alexis Lours -- Alexis Lours (talk) 13:19, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Alexis Lours (talk) 13:19, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Good feather detail, interesting pose, and pretty lighting. JayCubby (talk) 15:04, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 18:35, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per Jay. Some people may say this is a busy composition, but I like the complexity. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:21, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Support JackyM59 (talk) 10:22, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:27, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:27, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:11, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice clear image of the bird. The "busy" background helps illustrate its camouflage. --C messier (talk) 18:50, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:46, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2025 at 08:49:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Iran
Info created by Abdolahimehr – uploaded by Abdolahimehr – nominated by Kasir -- Kasir (talk) 08:49, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kasir (talk) 08:49, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose: heavy
perspective distortion, noised sky with moire, low quality overall -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:18, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Impressive composition and great use of wide-angle view. --August (talk) 09:38, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Type of photo where talking about PD is senseles. Good for me. --Mile (talk) 13:29, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- What does PD mean in this context? Perspective distortion? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:25, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment Yes, since mentioned above. --Mile (talk) 11:12, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I would love to support this if at least some of the distortion is corrected, but the leaning building and wall is a bit much. JayCubby (talk) 18:48, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment I’m sorry to see the opposing votes here, all of which focus on perspective distortion. From my point of view, this is a rare and outstanding example of the intentional artistic use of perspective distortion. It is a well-considered part of the composition and contributes significantly to the impression of extreme spaciousness in the depicted site. --August (talk) 11:19, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
- I understand your point about distortion. However, there are also quality issues in general. Look at the sky at 100% zoom. It's very noisy and has moiré. In my opinion, the quality is too low, as i mentored earlier in my vote. -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:20, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Support The birds make the difference. Yann (talk) 16:19, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose It is over-processed in my view. For example the clouds around the arch look weird. Also the extreme distortions severely impact the proportions -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:58, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per George Chernilevsky & others. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 03:02, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose In my eyes intentional artistic use of perspective distortion isn't working here. --Milseburg (talk) 11:40, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment You have to experiment with everything, especially in photography. But in the vast majority of cases, it's not very satisfying.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:59, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per George. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:28, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose. --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:46, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2025 at 02:59:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Historical/People#1900-1909
Info created by the Kolb brothers – uploaded and restored by JayCubby – nominated by JayCubby -- JayCubby (talk) 02:59, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Support An interesting (suspenseful?) scene -- JayCubby (talk) 02:59, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 05:24, 4 December 2025 (UTC)- Great photo, but maybe should be digitally restored for FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:38, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- I've got it Adam Cuerden (talk) 08:49, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Adam Cuerden, if you want the PSD, it's at https://files.catbox.moe/sgyer8.psd
- I don't use layers, and save my JPEGs at 100%, so it's not a huge deal either way. JayCubby (talk) 15:00, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- I've got it Adam Cuerden (talk) 08:49, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 09:17, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Meiræ 19:58, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:23, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:05, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Wobbanight (talk) 21:07, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 23:23, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose per my comments above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:42, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per above. --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:45, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
- Per which comments above? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:32, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 12:03, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:09, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Dec 2025 at 18:08:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Others
Info Created, uploaded, and nominated by User:Julian Lupyan – Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:08, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
Info I found this scene to be interesting, as it seems as though the entablature on the right is inspired by the much older one on the left. The whites being bright are a deliberate choice, as whitewashed buildings on a sunny day are rather blinding. – Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:08, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:08, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --August (talk) 18:27, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose You should document in that retouched template that it's a composite. The gate is unsharp and the rework around/near the right wall doesn't look good Poco a poco (talk) 20:02, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
- Hello, would you mind clarifying where it is you're mentioning? The photo is not a composite, and retouching was only done within what would now be the sky mask (specifically the left side, above the older entablature). Julian Lupyan (talk) 20:20, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Poco a poco: I have reworked the right wall as per Mile's advice (there was no rework prior). Would you mind specifying what you mean by "gate" so I can locally sharpen it? Julian Lupyan (talk) 17:08, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- I mean the left side of the image. Even if it would be sharp this is no FP to me. I don't understand what is extraordinary here. Poco a poco (talk) 19:18, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose unsharp, strong distorrted -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:52, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Good showing of Architecture, i would try to remove that wire.--Mile (talk) 13:24, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 23:22, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:45, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Dec 2025 at 17:33:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Science#Science
Info created by Phillipe Rekacewicz – uploaded by User:RedAndr – nominated by Prototyperspective -- Prototyperspective (talk) 17:33, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
Support High-quality, important, heavily-used, and educational.-- Prototyperspective (talk) 17:33, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:28, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 05:27, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Support JackyM59 (talk) 11:27, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Support. Only 250k, which is impressive for an SVG of this complexity. JayCubby (talk) 21:09, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:26, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Wobbanight (talk) 21:05, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 23:21, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Neutral no wow factor for me, though maybe that's because I've seen this diagram way too many times. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:30, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2025 at 21:18:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Ardea
Info Great egret fishing during a foggy day at Champ-Pittet, Switzerland. Exceptional weather circumstances with no wind and the presence of fog were needed to take this picture. The absence of wind allowed to have a perfect water reflection while the presence of fog allowed to have perfect colorless clean water instead of having the sky and vegetation reflecting their colors in the water. Image rotated 90 degrees to the left to better highlight the bird's perspective and the reflection on the water's surface.
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:18, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:18, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
Strong support In striking detail. Reminds me of POTY 2020, and will have my vote at POTY 2025! Incredible capture. Do you use a polarizing filter to eliminate reflections? JayCubby (talk) 21:22, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you, much appreciated! No polarizing filter was used, I just took advantage of the fog which allowed to have no sky and no vegetation reflecting in the water :) -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:46, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cool!!! Je-str (talk) 21:31, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:34, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:07, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Absolutely amazing Julian Lupyan (talk) 22:56, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Award worthy shot here. --Polinova (talk) 02:31, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Outstanding image --Tagooty (talk) 04:26, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
Support !! -- Radomianin (talk) 05:20, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 07:06, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:54, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Great decision turning it into landscape orientation. --August (talk) 11:33, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 18:03, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
Neutral This is an exceptional image but rotating it 90 degrees seems unnecessary and overly contrived. IMO right-side up would relieve the viewer from wondering what’s going on and bring better focus on the action of the bird. Also suggest cropping a little tighter (marked with note) to center the strike. --GRDN711 (talk) 00:56, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review but I honestly think that the current rotation fits the image better. From the very beginning (in 2021) I've orientated the image this way because it looked a lot better to me and also because it gave a very original artistic touch to the image as these almost unreal weather conditions can make it look like the subject is floating in the void and opening a portal to another world. Before uploading this to Wikimedia Commons I've spend a lot of time thinking if I would keep my original orientation or rotate it back to "normal" view. Every time I compared both images side by side, the current version looked like a 10/10 while the other only looked like a 7/10 to my eyes. To me it is only with this current rotation that we can truly enjoy the beauty of the reflection at it fullest because it is much more pleasant to compare the subject and the reflection by comparing left to right instead of comparing it top to bottom. Also I very much like the way this orientation is much more immersive as it gives us the bird's perspective. Finally, I think photography is also about proposing unusual perspective and surprising the viewer, making him look the image more than just a second to figure out what is going on. And it is anyway not hard to figure it out and in case people wouldn't, it is clearly written in the image description. So thank you for the suggestion but I stand by my rotation choice -- Giles Laurent (talk) 06:38, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 05:34, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per GRDN711. -- -donald- (talk) 06:18, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Strong support Very creative and artistic. - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 09:29, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment Creative shot. But i agree more tight crop would be beter. --Mile (talk) 13:18, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Done, new file uploaded with slightly tighter crop -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:30, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:38, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Mile (talk) 11:13, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 11:30, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Strong support Excellent. Thank you for rotating the image! It’s always good to challenge our visual habits a bit ;–) as long as the change serves a good purpose – and here it does, IMHO it is a substantial aesthetic improvement. – Aristeas (talk) 17:23, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Neutral per GRDN711. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:01, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Strong support POTY 2025! --Wobbanight (talk) 21:02, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support With an artistic flame but great Poco a poco (talk) 16:08, 7 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --C messier (talk) 13:17, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:31, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:07, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:58, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2025 at 17:17:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Brazil
Info created by Editorial J from Porto Alegre, Brasil – uploaded by Sturm – nominated by Heylenny -- heylenny (talk/edits) 17:17, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- heylenny (talk/edits) 17:17, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Lovely mood and good composition, however it is quite noisy near the bottom. – Julian Lupyan (talk) 01:12, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose I understand why you nominated it: the leaves are beautifully lit. However, the overall composition is not outstanding to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:44, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Unfortunately, I can't find anything exceptional. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:12, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
- Ohh of course. Unless it was a tree in Berlin uh... heylenny (talk/edits) 17:59, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I like the comp, but there is a bit of noise at the bottom, and the lighting doesn't help. --Wobbanight (talk) 20:57, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2025 at 19:15:01 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Plants#Family : Poaceae
Info created, uploaded and nominated by FlocciNivis -- FlocciNivis (talk) 19:15, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- FlocciNivis (talk) 19:15, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice to see something submitted for pure artistic value Cmao20 (talk) 15:02, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 17:22, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Julian Lupyan (talk) 20:38, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 16:33, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:53, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:08, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support A beautiful and atmospheric image. However, this subject could be dangerous for a mirrorless camera. --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 18:56, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:31, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2025 at 21:31:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Uzbekistan
Info Small Dome of Devonaboy mosque, Andijan. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 21:31, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 21:31, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment A very detailed image with a clean and clear composition. But I would strongly suggest, cropping the left symmetrically with the right side. --August (talk) 21:47, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
Done @August --Mile (talk) 11:06, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose
Thank you. But what becomes obvious now is, that the camera was not centred exactely so the perspective itself is not symetrical. So unfortunately, I think this can't be fixed in post. --August (talk) 17:27, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:42, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The lack of symmetry is a dealbreaker for me, Poco a poco (talk) 16:38, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Great picture. The lack of symmetry is not a dealbreaker for me. It does cause some tension, which I hope is intentional, but regardless, this is a very clear picture of a wonderful dome. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:13, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:55, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:09, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Ikan. I like the slight imbalance in lighting. JayCubby (talk) 13:57, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
Weak support because this is so close to symmetrical that the asymmetry doesn't look intentional and thus I do see it as a flaw; however, quality and motif is very good Cmao20 (talk) 15:00, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per above. --heylenny (talk/edits) 17:23, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose as per Cmao20 - Julian Lupyan (talk) 20:28, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:39, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Neutral per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:32, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:06, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Юрий Д.К. 15:59, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Fri 05 Dec → Wed 10 Dec Sat 06 Dec → Thu 11 Dec Sun 07 Dec → Fri 12 Dec Mon 08 Dec → Sat 13 Dec Tue 09 Dec → Sun 14 Dec Wed 10 Dec → Mon 15 Dec
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Mon 01 Dec → Wed 10 Dec Tue 02 Dec → Thu 11 Dec Wed 03 Dec → Fri 12 Dec Thu 04 Dec → Sat 13 Dec Fri 05 Dec → Sun 14 Dec Sat 06 Dec → Mon 15 Dec Sun 07 Dec → Tue 16 Dec Mon 08 Dec → Wed 17 Dec Tue 09 Dec → Thu 18 Dec Wed 10 Dec → Fri 19 Dec
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the nomination, then [edit].
- Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx|sig=~~~~}}
(You can leave thegalleryparameter blank if the image was not featured. If the nomination contains alternatives, you must add thealternative=xxxparameter with the name of the selected image between thegalleryand thesigparameter. See {{FPC-results-reviewed}} for examples and more explanations.) - Also edit the title of the nomination and add after the link
featuredornot featured– for example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate featured picture gallery page and section. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images on Commons:Featured pictures, list to find the gallery page, and search for the correct section. (An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.)
- Add the template
{{Assessments|featured=1}}to the image description page.- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the
com-nomparameter. For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted in the nominationCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use{{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}You also need thecom-nomparameter if the image gets renamed. - If the image is already featured on another Wikipedia, just add
featured=1to the {{Assessments}} template. For instance,{{Assessments|enwiki=1}}becomes{{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the
- Add the picture to the chronological archives of featured pictures. Append it at the end of the gallery using this format:
File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Title'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|xxx}}, {{o|xxx}}, {{n|xxx}}- The
#should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other entries on that page for examples. - The
titleshould be replaced by the bare name of the featured picture, without the ‘File:’ and without the file extension. - The
xin{{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}should be replaced by the count of support, oppose, and neutral votes respectively. - If the nomination was a set nomination, use this format:
File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Set: Title (X files)'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}
Replace theXin(X files)by the count of images in the set, and use the name of the first image from the set instead ofFile:xxxxx.jpgand for the title.
- The
- Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the nominator. For set nominations, use:== Set Promoted to FP ==, using the names of the set files instead of the XXXXXX and the title of the set instead of YYYYY.
<gallery>
File:XXXXXX.jpg
File:XXXXXX.jpg
</gallery>
{{FPpromotionSet2|YYYYY}} - Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedUploader|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the user who has uploaded the image, if that user is not the same as the nominator. - Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedCreator|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the creator, if the author is a different Commons user than nominator and uploader.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), you have to move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page.
- To find the current log page, visit the first page of the log for this month. If the header of that page contains a link with the text “Next part of this month”, the log for this month has been split into several parts because it contains too many entries. Click on the “Next part …” link and repeat this until you reach a page where the header does not offer a “Next part …” link; that’s the last and current log page.
- Now open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you are closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}or:{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/XXXXX}}. - Copy this line to the bottom of the current log page and save that page. Then remove this line from the candidate list and save that page, too.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):{{FPC-delist-results-reviewed|delist=x|keep=x|neutral=x|delisted=yes/no|sig=~~~~}}
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Ensifera ensifera (22271195865).jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delistedornot delisted; for example:=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change
featured=1tofeatured=2(do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes). If the image description page uses the old {{Featured picture}} template, replace it with{{Assessments|featured=2}}. - Remove the image from all categories beginning with “Featured [pictures]” (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris); but not from categories about featured pictures on specific Wikipedia editions, like Category:Featured pictures on Wikipedia, English.
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in the chronological archive of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture must not be removed from the chronological archives.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the nomination, then [edit].
- Edit the title of the nomination and add after the image link
not featured, for example:=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
